Is it acceptable for a notary public to notarize a document if the signer seems to be unduly influenced or coerced?

A notary public has a fundamental duty to ensure that the signer is acting voluntarily and understands the nature of the transaction. Notarization serves to confirm that the signee is signing a document of their own free will, and any signs of undue influence or coercion can compromise the integrity of that process.

When a signer appears to be pressured into signing, it raises ethical and legal concerns, as the notary could potentially be facilitating an act that undermines the signer’s genuine consent. Therefore, in situations where there are indications of undue influence or coercion, it is inappropriate for the notary to proceed with the notarization. Upholding the integrity of the notarial act ensures that the notary does not become a party to potential fraud or disputes arising from coerced agreements.

This principle not only protects the interests of the signer but also upholds the credibility of the notarial office, illustrating the importance of impartiality and respect for the rights of individuals involved in a transaction.